Ephemeral Senescence

by Carl Strang

One of my winter projects has been to study the herbaceous plants, so see how they might be identified in the snowy season. There have been many posts on that subject here over the past few winters. As I run down the list of species at Mayslake Forest Preserve, though, there are many I have not been able to find. Therefore I am trying to keep mindful of them this growing season, to follow their careers and see what becomes of them.

One group of plants in this category are the spring ephemerals, the woodland plants that send up shoots at the beginning of the growing season, bloom, set seeds, and finish as the forest canopy closes and light becomes greatly diminished at ground level. Some of the Mayslake species in this category are spring beauty, Dutchman’s breeches, cutleaf toothwort, and white trout lily.

A trout lily blooms on April 22.

A trout lily blooms on April 22.

The bottom line is that these plants withdraw to their roots and cut off their tops, which wither and are recycled by the efficient decomposers in the soil. This is true even of the trout lilies, whose leaves are thick and waxy.

The trout lily tops were well into their senescence on May 20.

The trout lily tops were well into their senescence on May 20.

This past week I looked, but failed to see any sign of the trout lilies where they had been so thick just a few weeks earlier. The same is true of the entire category of spring ephemerals. Here, then quickly gone…except that the roots or bulbs persist beneath the soil, patiently waiting for another year to pass.

Garter Snake Spotting

by Carl Strang

From time to time I encounter Chicago garter snakes (our local version of the eastern garter snake) at Mayslake Forest Preserve. When I do, I attempt to get good photos. I would like to see if individuals can be distinguished by details of their color pattern. I had good success with this at Fullersburg Woods with fawns, at least until their spots faded. Here is a photo from June 5.

The snake chose to leave before I could get a clearer look than this.

The snake chose to leave before I could get a clearer look than this.

In my files were photos of two other encounters in past years. One of these clearly had a different pattern.

This individual was photographed in 2010. Eight columns of pale scales separate the back of the head from the first dark spot that interrupts the side stripe. That number is only 5 or 6 in the first photo.

This individual was photographed in 2010. Eight columns of pale scales separate the back of the head from the first dark spot that interrupts the side stripe. That number is only 5 or 6 in the first photo.

The final snake, from last year, was more like this month’s individual.

The separation is five columns in this one.

The separation is five columns in this one.

Nevertheless, the two color patterns are different. Check out the small dark stripe, between the head and that first spot, at the boundary of the belly scutes and the side scales. That stripe is confined to the upper edges of the belly scutes in the 2012 snake, except for one little spot. In this year’s individual that stripe extends onto the lower halves of three adjacent side scales.

The color patterns are distinct in these three photos. They only are valid individual markers, though, if they do not change over time. I don’t know if such is the case.

Bowl and Doily Spider

by Carl Strang

Spider webs are delightful structures, and one of my favorites is that of the bowl and doily spider.

The globular bowl is above, the flat doily a short distance below it. The entire structure is suspended in a last year’s Canada goldenrod top.

The globular bowl is above, the flat doily a short distance below it. The entire structure is suspended in a last year’s Canada goldenrod top.

I was able to find the relatively small builder in the photo, and thought I might see if the species could be identified from it.

The spider has a distinctive pattern of white and chocolate brown.

The spider has a distinctive pattern of white and chocolate brown.

It proved to be no contest. There is only one species that makes this kind of web east of the Mississippi, Fontinella communis. Having gotten that far, I did a little reading on their natural history. The double web structure is thought to provide protection from predators above and below. The spider waits on the lower outside surface of the bowl. Prey enter the bowl, are tripped up by its interior cross strands, and fall to the bottom. The spider bites the prey, pulls them through the web, and wraps them.

Spring Trig

by Carl Strang

This is the story that made my participation in the Connor Prairie Bioblitz worth the trip. Beginning in 2008, I have heard occasional cricket trills that sounded identical to those of Say’s trigs, but were too early in the season. In 2008 my office was at Fullersburg Woods Forest Preserve, and on June 27 I heard one of those odd early songs. I also noted them on July 8 and 14 that year. In 2009 the first Say’s trig was singing on a more reasonable August 6, and in 2011 on July 31. In 2010 the first was on July 19 at Waterfall Glen, a little marginal perhaps but acceptable. Then last year I heard one near the Fox River in Kane County on June 10. Granted, last year was early phenologically, but this was completely out of line. I speculated that perhaps a rare few Say’s trigs hatched early and successfully overwintered as nymphs.

Then came last weekend’s bioblitz at Connor Prairie. This is too early to expect much singing insect action in the woods, so I headed straight to the large prairie restoration project west of the interpretive center.

View of the restored prairie from the balloon.

View of the restored prairie from the balloon.

The same area at ground level. This prairie first was seeded around 5 years ago.

The same area at ground level. This prairie first was seeded around 5 years ago.

There were plenty of spring field crickets chirping, as expected. But as I approached the taller grasses I also began to hear trills. Lots of them. Furthermore, they sounded just like Say’s trigs. On June 8. I began stalking these singers. Several times I got within 2-3 feet, but was never able to see one of the singing crickets in the dense grasses. When my approach stopped the singing, the cricket was able to outwait me. I was fairly certain they were above the ground, and so probably were not ground crickets. They became quiet in late morning. I heard one singing briefly in the afternoon, but that was it.

In the evening I returned, and as the sun slid to the horizon I was pleased to find that the mystery crickets were singing again. Again I tried stalking, and again was frustrated. Then, when yet another cricket stopped singing when I got within 2 feet, I shuffled my feet through the grass clump where his perch seemed to be, and up he hopped. I caught him in a vial.

He was a brown trig, but his head was entirely dark rather than pale with dark stripes as is characteristic of Say’s trig. I made the necessary decision and collected him.

Here he is, pinned and drying. The uniformly colored head is distinctive.

Here he is, pinned and drying. The uniformly colored head is distinctive.

The color, size and shape otherwise are similar to Say’s trig.

The color, size and shape otherwise are similar to Say’s trig.

I returned the next morning, but was unable to flush another male or sweep-net a female. None of my printed references mentioned anything like this cricket. I was able to connect to the Connor Prairie’s Wi-Fi, and searched the Singing Insects of North America website. Imagine my elation when I found it! This is an unusual instance of a species getting a common name before its scientific name is assigned. It has been designated the spring trig, Anaxipha species G. The SINA spreadsheet lists May and June dates, and gives a range that includes Indiana and Illinois, though apparently my cricket is the first specimen for Indiana. So, now there is another species to listen for in my travels. I will want to get some definition of this species’ season relative to Say’s trig. The reasonable assumption is that, unlike other Anaxipha, the spring trig overwinters as a nymph.

Bioblitz Species Hunt

by Carl Strang

Yesterday I introduced last weekend’s bioblitz at Connor Prairie in Indiana. My focus as a bioblitz participant is on singing insects, of course, but those are few early in June, even as far south as Indianapolis. Not to worry, though. There were teams focusing on many groups of organisms, but others had no specialists to address them, so I enjoyed filling in where I could. Odonata were one such group.

Twelve-spotted skimmer

Twelve-spotted skimmer

Powdered dancer

Powdered dancer

After much pondering, I concluded this was a female cobra clubtail. Indiana has a similar species, the handsome clubtail, but certain details ruled it out.

After much pondering, I concluded this was a female cobra clubtail. Indiana has a similar species, the handsome clubtail, but certain details ruled it out.

For instance, the C-shaped line at the top of the side of the thorax is connected, and apparently too thick for a handsome clubtail.

For instance, the C-shaped line at the top of the side of the thorax is connected, and apparently too thick for a handsome clubtail.

I also saw three bumblebee species.

Bombus fervidus was an easy ID.

Bombus fervidus was an easy ID.

There was a butterfly team, but I took advantage of photo ops that presented themselves.

Variegated fritillary

Variegated fritillary

Nevertheless, my main interest was singing insects. I found 4 species, and botany team leader Scott Namestnik added a 5th.

Green-striped grasshoppers were common, as were spring field crickets.

Green-striped grasshoppers were common, as were spring field crickets.

I saw a single sulfur-winged grasshopper. Scott ran across a pocket of Roesel’s katydid nymphs. Connor Prairie is about even with the Crawfordsville area where I found Roesel’s a couple years ago. So far, none have turned up farther south in Indiana.

The final species is worth a blog post all its own (to be continued).

Connor Prairie Bioblitz

by Carl Strang

Each year a bioblitz takes place somewhere in the state of Indiana. Last year I participated for the first time when the Kankakee Sands nature preserve was the location. This year it was at Connor Prairie, a historic interpretive park just north of Indianapolis.

Entrance to Connor Prairie Visitor Center

Entrance to Connor Prairie Visitor Center

It wasn’t all bioblitz. The usual history interpretation was taking place over the weekend.

The barn in the Connor homestead

The barn in the Connor homestead

A tethered balloon ride, providing an elevated overview of the area, is billed as a 19th Century attraction.

A tethered balloon ride, providing an elevated overview of the area, is billed as a 19th Century attraction.

The park invested considerable support for the bioblitz, a 24-hour hunt for as many species as participating scientists could find on the property.

Connor Prairie volunteers provided a wide range of bioblitz related activities.

Connor Prairie volunteers provided a wide range of bioblitz related activities.

Outside exhibitors added enriching educational experiences.

 Introducing children to the world of biodiversity is an important part of a public bioblitz.

Introducing children to the world of biodiversity is an important part of a public bioblitz.

The scientists also were interested in teaching.

A presentation on bats by scientists from Ball State University

A presentation on bats by scientists from Ball State University

Scientists were encouraged to do their work where people could look over their shoulders.

Purdue University entomologists identify beetles. Participating scientists enjoyed sharing their finds with interested members of the public.

Purdue University entomologists identify beetles. Participating scientists enjoyed sharing their finds with interested members of the public.

Tomorrow I’ll share some of what I found at Connor Prairie.

May Phenology 3: Bird Arrival Dates

by Carl Strang

The pattern in the past has been for migrant bird arrival dates to be more similar between years than is true of flower and insect first appearances. Birds are capable of making small adjustments, but in general they are following the dictates of photoperiod, which observes the same calendar each year. Median arrival dates were thus only 3 days later at Mayslake Forest Preserve in 2013 than in 2012 (16 species), 8.5 days later than in 2011 (20 species), 1 day later than in 2010 (19 species), and 9 days later than in 2009 (19 species).

The eastern wood-pewee matched the median difference in arrival dates for both 2010 and 2009.

The eastern wood-pewee matched the median difference in arrival dates for both 2010 and 2009.

The respective differences for April and earlier were 7, 3, 2.5, and 5 days. The pattern of past years was sustained in magnitude, but it is also true that all median arrival dates were later in 2013 than in the other years. The late development of flowers and emergence of insects probably accounts for this. The birds can adjust their migratory timing that much.

May Phenology 2: Insect First Appearances

by Carl Strang

Today’s seasonal comparison is between first appearance dates of insects at Mayslake Forest Preserve, through May. This includes April data, as there were not enough species in that month to consider alone.  As was the case with plants, the most dramatic difference was between this year and last: 15 species appeared a median 33 days later in 2013 than in 2012.

The differences from other years were smaller: 10 days later in 2013 than 2011 (15 species), likewise 10 days later than 2010 (13 species), and 5 days later than 2009 (12 species).

The bee fly Bombylius major first appeared 10 days later in 2013 than in 2010.

The bee fly Bombylius major first appeared 10 days later in 2013 than in 2010.

Green darners are our earliest dragonflies each year. In 2013 the first showed up 5 days later than in 2009.

Green darners are our earliest dragonflies each year. In 2013 the first showed up 5 days later than in 2009.

The numbers did not fully parallel those for flowering dates, in part because the months were combined, and in part because the sample sizes were smaller. Nevertheless, the 2013-2012 comparison is the consistent one. Also, this year is confirmed as the latest of the five I have been at Mayslake.

May Phenology 1: First Flowering Dates

by Carl Strang

The end of May brings the next opportunity to compare seasonal timings between 2013 and the previous years. There’s nothing special in this choice, except that months are a familiar common language and they provide a sensible number of comparisons each year. The data I collect are limited to Mayslake Forest Preserve, because I am out in that property most regularly and so can make the most consistent comparisons. Today I’ll share the first flower dates, which provide the soundest results.

As expected, flowering phenology this May was much later than last year, a median 24 days later for 73 species. This is 10 days less than the April difference, but it is typical for the first flower dates to converge as the season progresses.

The broad-leaved woolly sedge, Carex pellita, was the median species this time.

The broad-leaved woolly sedge, Carex pellita, was the median species this time.

If we jump to the other early year, 2010, the difference also is less. The median first flower date was 12 day later in 2013 than in 2010 (54 species). The corresponding difference in April was 17 days.

Yellow sweet clover fell on the 12-day median difference.

Yellow sweet clover fell on the 12-day median difference.

The surprise came from the comparison between 2013 and the other late years, 2011 and 2009. The median difference was exactly 0 days for 2011 (67 species), and 2013 was only one day later than 2009 (53 species; the respective differences were 4.5 and 5 days in April).

Common spiderwort first bloomed one day later in 2013 than it did in 2009.

Common spiderwort first bloomed one day later in 2013 than it did in 2009.

All of this continues to underline how unusual last year was.

Bumblebee Mimics

by Carl Strang

There are mimics, and there are mimics. A couple years ago at Mayslake Forest Preserve I found a syrphid fly that mimics bumblebees.

This is the narcissus bulb fly, Merodon equestris.

This is the narcissus bulb fly, Merodon equestris.

It was comparable in size to a small worker bumblebee, though none of our local bumblebee species match this color pattern, and it doesn’t really pass for more than a few seconds’ examination.

But there are others, like the one I saw yesterday:

This is more like it. It’s big, the size of a bumblebee queen, and it’s hairy, and its color pattern resembles those of a couple local species.

This is more like it. It’s big, the size of a bumblebee queen, and it’s hairy, and its color pattern resembles those of a couple local species.

This is a robber fly, a predator known to catch bees as well as other relatively large flying insect prey. There are a couple species in the East which are very similar to one another. Their larvae tunnel in rotten logs, preying even then on other larvae they encounter. After maturing, they perch in sun flecks on leaves or on more solid perches. The more common one in DuPage County appears to be Laphria thoracica.

Here’s another individual I photographed in July 2008 at Danada Forest Preserve.

Here’s another individual I photographed in July 2008 at Danada Forest Preserve.

Note the long black hairs on the top, front and sides of the head. If those were a dense solid yellow this would be a different species, Laphria grossa. I encountered those in south central Pennsylvania, and the impression was much the same. That beak probably could deliver a nasty bite if you grabbed this critter, but why would you want to? These take a longer, closer look to distinguish them from bumblebees. That beak is one giveaway. Another is the single pair of wings rather than two. Also, the perched fly frequently snaps its head to different angles, tracking possible prey. Bumblebees don’t do that. These robber flies are on my short list of niftiest local mimics.

Why the mimicry? One has to think it provides some protection from vertebrate predators. Also, these are among the largest of the robber flies, most of which are not mimics. That large size seems to slow them down, as they don’t fly nearly as fast as their smaller relatives. Perhaps the bumblebee coloration and speed leads prey to ignore them until it’s too late.

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 66 other followers

%d bloggers like this: