by Carl Strang
Last week I posted an overview of recent research that casts light on food web and ecosystem function. Things are much more complicated than that relatively simple summary when one digs into the details. This week I want to provide a couple disparate examples. Toward the end of the overview I cited some results suggesting that ecosystems with fewer species tend to be less stable, and that such ecosystems often are marginal, for instance because of low productivity. Evolution is a creative force, however, that produces adaptations allowing organisms to persist in such marginal ecosystems. This increases diversity, improving the chance that the associated food webs will persist.
One example pertains to birds (Jetz, Walter, Dustin R. Rubenstein. Environmental Uncertainty and the Global Biogeography of Cooperative Breeding in Birds. Current Biology, 2010; DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.075 ). They reviewed the world’s bird species and found that cooperative breeding patterns such as helpers at the nest and other communal reproductive behaviors are more common in places with inconsistent climate patterns, particularly in rainfall.
The grey-crowned babbler is on the short list of my favorite Australian birds. They often forage in groups, they have amazing silly sounding vocalizations, and they nest communally.
The cooperative breeding trait allows this species to persist in a difficult desert environment. It’s not the only strategy, as there are plenty of birds in that community which do not nest communally, but again, evolution is a creative force that can find many solutions to survival problems.
Another evolutionary force, leading to stability in a class of mutualistic relationships, was highlighted in a study last year (Kiers, E. Toby, et al. 2011. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 333:880-882). This research looked at mycorrhizae, partnerships in which fungi channel nutrients from the soil into plant roots, and roots provide a medium (sloughing off bark, for instance) in which the fungi can grow.
In laboratory experiments Kiers and company found “that plants can detect, discriminate, and reward the best fungal partners with more carbohydrates. In turn, their fungal partners enforce cooperation by increasing nutrient transfer only to those roots providing more carbohydrates…we conclude that, unlike many other mutualisms, the symbiont cannot be ‘enslaved.’ Rather, the mutualism is evolutionarily stable because control is bidirectional, and partners offering the best rate of exchange are rewarded.”